In reality it consisted of a thin layer of texture at whatever altitude the nearest METAR reported overcast. The overcast layer boasted about on the website was way too good to be true. The result of having a cloud coverage of 5000 km 2 above 20,000 ft, is a well defined box of clouds below the aircraft, not very convincing at all. However, setting the cloud coverage area to anything past a 5000km 2, which is not convincing at all above 15,000ft, resulted in a choppy experience of <30 fps. My computer is no slouch with an i5-4690k, 16 GB of ram, and a GTX 970, way more that the recommended specs. The better frame-rate did not happen, in fact, it got slightly worse. That is what I spent 40 no-refundable dollars on, but unfortunately, I do not feel like that is not what I got. I was excited to finally have convincing overcast layers, wonderful cirrus clouds, and a better high altitude experience, all with higher frame rates as advertised on the x-aviation website. After reading all the reviews, watching many vlogs, and seeing the wonderful pictures posted on this subreddit, I was finally convinced to purchase skymaxx pro v3. First let me start off by making it clear that most of the flying I do in X-plane 10 is in the Flight Factor 767 between F元00 and F元90.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |